0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Çѱ¹»ê¾÷°£È£ÇÐȸÁö¿¡ ÀοëµÈ Âü°í¹®ÇåÀÇ Á¤È®¼º

Accuracy of References in Korean Journal of Occupational Health Nursing

»ê¾÷°£È£ÇÐȸÁö 2010³â 19±Ç 2È£ p.217 ~ 222
KMID : 0384920100190020217
ÀÌÀ±Á¤ ( Yi Yun-Jeong ) - Çѱ¹º¸°Ç»çȸ¿¬±¸¿ø

À̺¹ÀÓ ( Lee Bok-Im ) - °¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ

Abstract

¸ñÀû : º» ¿¬±¸´Â Çѱ¹»ê¾÷°£È£ÇÐȸÁö¿¡ ÀοëµÈ Âü°í¹®ÇåÀÇ Ãâóǥ±â ¿À·ùÀ²°ú ¿À·ù °æÇâÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

¹æ¹ý: 2007³âºÎÅÍ 2009³â±îÁö 3³â°£ Çѱ¹»ê¾÷°£È£ÇÐȸÁö¿¡ ¼ö·ÏµÈ ³í¹®¿¡ ÀοëµÈ ¿µ¹® ±¹¿Ü¿øÀú 426ÆíÀ» ¿¬±¸´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÇÏ¿©, Âü°í¹®ÇåÀÇ ÀúÀÚ¸í, ³í¹® Á¦¸ñ, Àú³Î¸í, ±Ç ¹øÈ£, ÃâÆdz⵵, ÆäÀÌÁö ¹øÈ£ µî 6°¡Áö Ç׸ñÀ» °ËÅäÇÏ¿© ÁÖ¿ä ¿À·ù¿Í ¹Ì¼¼ ¿À·ù·Î ±¸ºÐÇÏ¿´´Ù.

°á°ú: ºÐ¼®´ë»ó ³í¹® Áß Àο뿡 ¿À·ù°¡ ÀÖ¾ú´ø ¹®ÇåÀº 46.5%À̾ú´Ù. ÁÖ¿ä ¿À·ù¸¦ Æ÷ÇÔÇÑ ³í¹®Àº 34.5%ÀÌ°í, ¹Ì¼¼ ¿À·ù¸¦ Æ÷ÇÔÇÑ ³í¹®Àº 18.8%À̾ú´Ù. ÁÖ¿ä ¿À·ù¿¡¼­ °¡Àå ¸¹ÀÌ ³ªÅ¸³ª´Â ÇüÅ´ ÀúÀÚ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿À·ùÀ̾úÀ¸¸ç, ¹Ì¼¼ ¿À·ù¿¡¼­´Â Á¦¸ñ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿À·ù°¡ °¡Àå ¸¹¾Ò´Ù.

°á·Ð: ³í¹®¿¡ ÀοëµÇ´Â Âü°í¹®ÇåÀÇ Á¤È®¼ºÀ» ³ô¿© ³í¹® ¹× ÀúÀÚÀÇ ½Å·Ú¸¦ À¯ÁöÇÏ°í ÇÐȸÁöÀÇ ÁúÀ» Çâ»ó½ÃÅ°±â À§Çؼ­´Â ¿¬±¸ÀÚ»Ó¸¸ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó ½É»çÀ§¿ø°ú ÆíÁýÀ§¿øȸ ¸ðµÎÀÇ ³ë·ÂÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÏ´Ù.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of references in articles published in Korean Journal of Occupational Health Nursing.

Methods: All references in articles from 2007 to 2009 were compared with PubMed for authors, years, titles, journals, volume, and page accuracy. Four hundred twenty six references were reviewed. Errors were classified either major or minor.

Results: Overall rate of inaccurate reference was 46.5%. 34.5% were major errors and 18.8% were minor errors. Most common major errors occurred in the authors, whereas most common minor errors occurred in the titles.
Conclusion: It is necessary that authors, reviewers, and editorial committees make more efforts to enhance the reference accuracy.
KeyWords
Âü°í¹®Çå, Àοë, Á¤È®¼º
Reference, Citation, Accuracy
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI)